Loyal opposition

Discussion in 'General Theology' started by Anthony D'Arienzo, Jul 9, 2017.

  1. Anthony D'Arienzo is a Verified MemberAnthony D'Arienzo Well-Known Member
    Anthony D'Arienzo

    Member

    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    43
  2. Anthony D'Arienzo is a Verified MemberAnthony D'Arienzo Well-Known Member
    Anthony D'Arienzo

    Member

    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    43
    #2 Anthony D'Arienzo is a Verified MemberAnthony D'Arienzo, Jul 10, 2017
    Last edited: Jul 10, 2017
    I have invited people from the SBC to join here to discuss these issues

    Lets take a look;
    .
    Here he claims to Have a PH.D. in systematic theology and does not grasp that a so called 3 pt calvinist is someone who is yet without understanding.
    I find this disturbing as he has written it....He cannot really articulate the position without making a strawman.
     
  3. Anthony D'Arienzo is a Verified MemberAnthony D'Arienzo Well-Known Member
    Anthony D'Arienzo

    Member

    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    43

    Here is goes for the strawman approach suggesting Fatalism...which no cal believes.
    He has a flawed beginning, and a flawed understanding.


    He suggests a god who is not in control of all things? contingency??
     
  4. Anthony D'Arienzo is a Verified MemberAnthony D'Arienzo Well-Known Member
    Anthony D'Arienzo

    Member

    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Yes...Calvinists see what scripture declares and view it as God has revealed it. You Eric start with man as one of your speakers, Leighton Flowers is known for as a champion of man centered theology and carnal philosophy, not bible based exegesis. We saw his failure in the romans 9 debate and his 24/7 opposition to the truths we know as Calvinism.

    Unfounded assertions...Strawmanfest...show what you say is true without bearing false witness.
     
  5. Anthony D'Arienzo is a Verified MemberAnthony D'Arienzo Well-Known Member
    Anthony D'Arienzo

    Member

    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Hankins mentions that the Baptist faith and message is weak on calvinism.
    Yes it is because it was written to be a compromise document ....to allow goats go come in with the idea that if we get them in,maybe they will hear truth and make some progress.
    Using Finneys new measures they have many goats in among the assembly.
    The goats thinking they have free will pick and choose what they would like to believe instead of dealing honestly with the texts.
    So a doctrine of compromise that remains vague on the harder issues,is just what the doctor ordered.
    Eric Hankins does not want those pesky Calvinists coming in and disturbing the weak lifeway booklets...and actually opening the scriptures up.
     
  6. Anthony D'Arienzo is a Verified MemberAnthony D'Arienzo Well-Known Member
    Anthony D'Arienzo

    Member

    Messages:
    688
    Likes Received:
    124
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Yes...this guy Ed is another clown who just wants trouble, I have invited him here and to Bptistboard but like those gutless wonders at bibleforums will never man up...

    I am trying to reach some of the others...meanwhile Leighton Flowers has found some willing fools to listen to his carnal philosophy
     
  7. He'd fit right in at Baptist Board.
     
  8. Joe is a Verified MemberJoe Tattooed Theist
    Joe

    Administrator Site Supporter

    Messages:
    347
    Likes Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Theology:
    Open Theist
    Wait.... they want to ban anyone who does not adopt their specific interpretation of scripture?

    o_O Yeah bro, send them our way. This site will never ban anyone for belief differences.

    Unless of course they claim 2,000 revelations from Christ that are in contradicts of scripture ;)
     
    • Funny Funny x 1

Share This Page